
The administrative emphyteutic lease (BEA) is based on a precise legal mechanism, but its implications vary significantly depending on whether one is considering the public lessor or the private lessee. Real rights, property taxation, duration of commitment, fate of constructions at the end of the lease: each parameter modifies the economic balance of the arrangement. This article compares the respective obligations of the parties and identifies the most common points of friction.
Property Taxation of the BEA: A Often Underestimated Formal Condition
The issue of property tax on built properties (TFPB) within the framework of a BEA has recently been clarified. The Council of State ruled that the emphyteutic tenant is only liable for the TFPB if the lease is published in the property file during the relevant tax year. Without this publication, the tax burden remains on the public owner, which can create an unexpected budgetary gap for the community.
Read also : Everything You Need to Know About Season 3 of The Alienist: Rumors, Release Date, and Expectations
This formal condition changes the game for arrangements where the lessee is a private individual. A community that delays publishing the BEA in the property file bears the TFPB even though the property is operated by a third party. The stakes are not marginal: for sports facilities or large real estate complexes, the annual bill can represent a significant budget item.
To delve deeper into the characteristics of the administrative emphyteutic lease, it is therefore essential to integrate this fiscal dimension from the drafting of the contract, explicitly providing for publication deadlines and the distribution of the burden during the transitional period.
Read also : Everything You Need to Know About the Detailed ADMR Hourly Rate 2026: Guide and Simulator

Obligations of the Lessor and Lessee: Comparative Table
The BEA distributes rights and obligations asymmetrically. The table below summarizes the commitments of each party on the structuring points of the contract.
| Parameter | Lessor (community) | Lessee (emphyteutic tenant) |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | Set between 18 and 99 years, with no possibility of unilateral termination except for serious fault | Commitment for the entire duration, no right to automatic renewal |
| Real rights | Retains ownership of the land | Holds a real estate right that can be mortgaged |
| Works and constructions | No obligation to finance | Finances and carries out improvements, which revert to the lessor at the end of the lease without compensation |
| Fee (rent) | Receives rent, generally modest | Pays the fee stipulated in the contract |
| TFPB | Liable if the lease is not published in the property file | Liable upon effective publication |
| Object of the lease | Must fall under a public service mission or general interest | Must comply with the designation defined in the contract |
What emerges from this table: the lessee bears the bulk of the financial risk (works, taxation, operation) while the community recovers a valued asset without direct investment.
Real Right and Mortgage: The Financing Lever for the Lessee
The BEA grants the lessee a real estate right over the property for the entire duration of the lease. This real right is transferable and can be mortgaged, distinguishing it from a simple temporary occupation authorization of public land.
This possibility of mortgage is the main financing lever for the arrangement. A private lessee who needs to construct a facility on public land can offer this real right as collateral to a banking institution. Without this guarantee, most heavy investment projects on public land would not find financing.
Limits of the Real Right at the End of the Lease
The real right extinguishes at the end of the contract. All constructions and improvements made by the lessee then become the property of the community, without any compensation due to the lessee. This mechanism, provided for by Article L. 1311-2 of the General Code of Local Authorities, constitutes the counterbalance for the long duration of operation granted.
In practice, this extinction poses a problem at the end of the cycle: a lessee who has financed heavy works must amortize their investments over the duration of the lease. If the chosen duration is too short compared to the cost of the works, the economic balance deteriorates.
Conditions for Recourse to the BEA: Public Service Mission and General Interest
The BEA can only be concluded for a strictly defined object. The contract must aim at:
- The accomplishment of a public service mission on behalf of the local authority
- The realization of a general interest operation within the competence of the community
- The construction of sports facilities and related equipment necessary for their establishment
A lessee wishing to use the property for a purely commercial activity, without a link to the general interest, cannot benefit from a BEA. The legal qualification of the project is therefore a mandatory prerequisite before any contractual negotiation.
Requalification of the Lease: A Risk to Monitor
A ruling from the Court of Cassation in July 2024 reminded the conditions under which an emphyteutic lease can be requalified, notably into a commercial lease. This case law primarily concerns private emphyteutic leases, but it signals to BEA practitioners that the drafting of the contract must lock in the object and qualification from the outset to avoid any subsequent disputes.

Accounting Treatment in Local Public Companies
The BEA generates specific accounting entries when the lessee is a local public company (SPL). The real right conferred by the lease is recorded as an asset on the SPL’s balance sheet, with corresponding liabilities for fees and works. This treatment has been subject to detailed accounting doctrine, which distinguishes:
- Usage rights recorded as intangible assets
- Liabilities for fees accounted for as off-balance sheet liabilities
- Construction or improvement works, amortized over the remaining duration of the lease
The amortization period for the works is aligned with the duration of the BEA, not the physical lifespan of the property. A building constructed to last longer than the lease will still be fully amortized before the end of the contract.
The BEA remains a tool for enhancing public land, with its balance relying on three interdependent parameters: duration, the amount of investments by the lessee, and publication in the property file. Neglecting any of these three elements is enough to weaken the entire contractual arrangement.